The research reaches beyond conventional methods of monitoring water security by measuring the emotional wellbeing of pastoralists and how this is impacted by water availability and use.

  • DatesSeptember 2017 to March 2019
  • SponsorDFID/ESRC funded
  • Funded£260,430
  • PartnersFriendship Support Association, IRC Ethiopia, International Water Management Institute (IWRM) and Oxfam Ethiopia.

Ethiopia has over 12 million pastoralists that raise livestock, and move their herds in search of fresh pasture and water supplies. These populations are vulnerable to environmental pressures that threaten their livelihoods and can increase the risk of conflict over resources. Water security is a particularly acute challenge and, as such, pastoralists have developed complex water use patterns to support both human and animal welfare. In this context, there are fundamental questions over the appropriateness of conventional water access indicators used by government and multilateral agencies to adequately capture such complex practices. In short, conventional indicators are considered to poorly reflect actual patterns of pastoralist water use which leads to a misunderstanding of pastoralists' water-related resilience strategies and vulnerabilities to risks such as climate change, conflict and poverty. This results in water programmes and policies that too often exacerbate rather than improve the resilience of pastoralists to deal with such water security risks.

This new ESRC-DFID research project called "Water-security in Ethiopia and the Emotional Response of Pastoralists (WEEP)" intends to shift thinking about how to monitor and evaluate the success of water programmes for these groups. Instead of trying to capture complex water use patterns through an infrastructure or service based approach, the research will explore the role of water in shaping emotional well-being. This will feed into the development a novel experience-based indicator of pastoralists' water-related emotional well-being, which will help sharpen focus on actual water-use experiences. It also represents the start of a new research agenda that will look within the household unit to understand the services experienced by different household members including men and women, and those away from home tending livestock. As indicators tend to drive water sector strategy, developing improved indicators is one of the best ways to ensure research impact.